POST 13: Peer Evaluation

After going over the criteria discussed in class, our group has determined the final criteria in which each member will be rated on by fellow group members. Each member will get a rating 1 to 10 for each of the following catagories. All members will fill out this survey for each member of the group,including oneself.

1. Attendance/participation: Did they attend class and take part in group discussion with thoughtful ideas?

2. Initiative/Reliability: Do they get done the tasks they say their going do?

3.Cooperation/Communication: Do they express good communication skills such as; answering emails, coming to meetings, and working well will other teamates.

4. Research Quality - Everyone was expected to obtain certian research, Was their research done fully and from quality resources?

5. Deadlines met - Was the students information posted our grous google docs in a timely manner?

5S PROCESS

Looking through my room to apply the 5s process I found that I already have a good start on fulling the 5s's However, the one I found I needed to work on was that everything has its place for quick retrieval and  storage. But I also think this one goes hand in hand with cleanliness. So I started with my desk I cleaned it up and made sure that everything was in its place for quick retrieval and for proper storage. Below I have a before and after of how my desk looks. 




                                                                   BEFORE

 

                                                                 AFTER

My desk is now usable and designed for better studying, My Book that I need the most are on my desk and now I have plenty of room for my computer and papers.

Quality Management

Jeffrey Thompson serves as a quality improvement advisor for the Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn. In this position Thompson works to facilitate process assessment, improvement and redesign. Thompson’s responsibilities include consultation, facilitation and education on quality improvement methodologies and tools to provide value to patients that is consistent with the principles and goals of Mayo Clinic
Thompson joined Mayo Clinic in July 2008 as a Quality Improvement Advisor within Quality Management Services in Rochester. Prior to joining Mayo, he worked as a Six Sigma Black Belt within the Lean Six Sigma Department at the Memorial Hermann Healthcare System in Houston, Texas. Thompson is a licensed physical therapist with clinical inpatient rehabilitation experience. He has a master’s in healthcare administration from Texas Woman’s University in Houston and a master’s in physical therapy from Ohio University, Athens, Ohio.
mayo clinic
http://www.centerfortransforminghealthcare.org/UserFiles/file/Mayo_Thompson.pdf

specific Ethical Question

Would letting a football player play knowing they are injured such as a concussion and not say anything right because it is their last football game?

NO! they could hurt themselves even worse. It is mine job to tell them and their coaches of the injury if decide to play it is on them.

I can understand where the concussion might be minor and the player would be able to play. However, there is a protocol for a reason. And if the player is cleared too early they could cause further injury by sustaining a TBI or Traumatic brain injury. I will stand by my decision as to not let them play they could further hurt themselves or others.
 interview with Head Athletic trainer at UW- Stout Susan Lew
http://www.highschoolbioethics.org/briefs/nfl.asp

post 9

https://docs.google.com/present/edit?id=0AfQ1sF3FAtuyZGRwNjlmOGpfNGhzM3M0M2Y4&hl=en_US

POST 6,7 and 8

Blog Post 6: Diversity

Diversity to me is about learning. We all come from different background and from different experiences which give every person on matter what their race or color, a different view of life. Within my field of interest there isn’t only one right way to achieve a successful result, therefore, being able to learn and grow with new people and new techniques will be the best way for me to be successful within my career.

From Wharton College Physical Therapist assistant

“Furthermore, the program is committed to the development of health care practitioners who appreciate and value racial, social, and cultural diversity, who are dedicated to the safe, legal, and ethical practice of physical therapy, who seek involvement in professional organizations that govern the practice of physical therapy, and who are committed to lifelong learning.”

 “We, the Nazareth community, embrace both respect for the person and freedom of speech. The College promotes civility and denounces acts of hatred or intolerance. The free exchange of ideas is possible only when concepts, values and viewpoints can be expressed and challenged in a manner that is neither threatening nor demeaning.

 It is the policy of Nazareth College, in keeping with its efforts to foster a community in which the diversity of all members is respected, not to discriminate on the basis of race, religion, color, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, national or ethnic origin, sex, age, marital or veteran status, disability, carrier status, genetic predisposition or any other protected status. Respect for the dignity of all peoples is an essential part of the College's tradition and mission, and its vision for the future.”

“The Ohio State University is committed to building a diverse faculty and staff for employment and promotion to ensure the highest quality workforce, to reflect human diversity, and to improve opportunities for minorities and women. The university embraces human diversity and is committed to equal employment opportunity, affirmative action, and eliminating discrimination. This commitment is both a moral imperative consistent with an intellectual community that celebrates individual differences and diversity, as well as a matter of law.”

 “COSA Diversity is consistent with the Third Tradition of COSA, which states that the only requirement for COSA membership is that our lives have been affected by compulsive sexual behavior. The COSA Fellowship welcomes all genders, all varieties of relationship to the addict, all religious and spiritual preferences, all employment statuses, all marital statuses, all ethnicities, cultures, and languages. COSA does not discriminate on the basis of class, sexual orientation or gender identification, physical or mental challenges, race, or national origins. In COSA, we find hope whether or not there is a sexually addicted person currently in our lives. COSA Diversity is consistent with the First Tradition of COSA, which states that our common welfare should come first, personal recovery depends upon COSA unity. “

“This document addresses the importance of providing medical students with a culturally competent curriculum. It outlines what it means to be culturally competent, what should be included in a medical school curriculum to address diversity, and it also includes how to assess students’ level of cultural competence through their attitudes, knowledge, and skills. The document describes how to use the Tool for Assessing Cultural Competence Training (TACCT), as well as how to develop and implement a culturally competent curriculum.”

Blog Post 7: General Ethics

APTA: Physical therapists and physical therapist assistants should strive to apply principles of altruism, excellence, caring, ethics, respect, communication and accountability in working together with other professionals to achieve optimal health and wellness in individuals and communities.

I found that there is a world confederation for physical therapy. No matter where you are in the world you have the same code of ethics and code of conduct. Click to view the full document. http://www.wcpt.org/policy/ps-ethical-responsibilities

Blog Post 8: Ethical Question

Is it ethical for a physician to accept Wild tickets from a pharmaceutical rep to take her family to the game?

In my opinion I don’t feel it is unethical for a Doctor to take the tickets. A Doctor takes an oath to provide the best care to their ability. A Doctor would never give a pill to someone if it would not benefit the patents health. All the Pharmaceutical companies are doing are selling a brand. Every company has an antibiotic that’s good and works. However, the wild tickets are not going to erase 7 plus years of school and training. The doctor will not all of a sudden start handing out pills that aren’t needed. (which would be unethical) So yes, accepting the tickets is completely ethical.

Post 4: Carbon Dioxide Paper Evaluation

Post 4: Carbon Dioxide Paper Evaluation

1. Post your group's presentation.

https://docs.google.com/present/edit?id=0AfQ1sF3FAtuyZGRwNjlmOGpfMGdqc2hmYmRm&hl=en_US

2. Reflect on the strengths and weaknesses of the criteria established. Where these good criteria, or should there have been different criteria established? I thought this was good criteria. However, maybe more should have been added, the IPCC has alot of criteria that a paper has to meet.

3. Reflect on the strengths and weaknesses of the presentations as a whole. Consider the "yes" and "no" groups as a whole. The yes group didn't have alot of prove that it was valued. And then when asked about certain points they just answered what they thought the answer was instead of finding proof in the paper or in the science community. Strengths were they did have some scientific information and they did research alot of sources. The No's had alot of prove that the information was invalid and could prove that the data was not accurate. A weakness was there was alot of repeat of information.

4. Reflect on the group management of your group. What went well, what did not? We all worked well together, we found each others strength and used them. We also put it up on google so we all could work on it at the same time. I don't really think anything went poorly. We worked pretty smoothly.

5. Reflect on the personal "ethic" you felt in your group. Did you believe in your position? Where you arguing against your beliefs?  I was arguing for my belief, I do think there was some good information however, overall  the paper was invalid.

6. Did the class make the correct decision when considering the broader impacts of the global warming/climate change debate? Why? We were not debate about the climate change. We were arguing whether the paper was valid and I do think the class made the right decision.

7. Explain the statement, "What we do in the US, soon will not matter." Provide evidence to justify this statement.  Well, there are two ways this can go. And I ask in terms of what. Education? inventions? in war? And I do agree with some if the US decided to take on the world what we would do probably would not matter.  We are slowly being out number in this world of Europe, Aisa and other Countries. Therefore, the things we might do maybe not matter.

8. Explain this statement, "What we do as individuals matters." Provide evidence to justify this statement. I agree, there has been some very important and successful people in this world. This world would be drasticly different with out them. No eletricity? no phones?, no medicines? This world is build on indiviuals and the things they let their minds discover.